winnipeg-shocking

[degengambler 0]

i appreciate, honor and respect all you generous gentlemen who help
out with your selections. with the overwhelming slant on winnipeg, i
fired away. now i look ahead with trepidation--can the CFL be defeated??
last year was tough also if i remember...............:think2:

 

[everyman 0]

i look forward to your picks with great anticipation

 

[thirdperson 0]

So far, underdogs have won the majority of sides ATS. In 2009, blindly betting underdogs ATS was profitable.

 

[CarolinaKid 0]

dont udterstand the overwhelming this with peg, this was a tor play or no play at all last nite imo........why play into weak lines on a fav at home..ck

 

[degengambler 0]

Everyman--i'd give you my plays--only if you promised to fade, fade and fade. Obviously
you don't understand the meaning of my thread.

 

[degengambler 0]

Ck--you are correct---your post did suggest the dog as the play. I was just saying our posters here and at eog, and at covers,
all leaned toward the peg. So i went with the consensus in this instance. Not crying, just wondering what we have to
look forward to, if those who handicap--so many, by the way--- had the big fav, and it loses outright.
Perhaps the message here is to tread slowly no matter what--in the cfl.

 

[X-Files 0]

Ck--you are correct---your post did suggest the dog as the play. I was just saying our posters here and at eog, and at covers,
all leaned toward the peg. So i went with the consensus in this instance. Not crying, just wondering what we have to
look forward to, if those who handicap--so many, by the way--- had the big fav, and it loses outright.
Perhaps the message here is to tread slowly no matter what--in the cfl.

The Pinnacle lean was a big warning sign to stay off Winnipeg.

When everyone is on one side it should also raise some eyebrows.

When both of these happen together and oppose each other, even more so.